Welcome to the CHICKEN Scheme pasting service
Bidirectional typing with PLT Redex added by megane on Thu Aug 26 13:10:02 2021
;; -*- mode: scheme -*- #lang racket (require redex) (require rackunit) ;; Straightforwardish translation from this tutorial: ;; Bidirectional Typing Rules: A Tutorial, David Raymond Christiansen ;; Simply typed lambda-calculus (define-language L (t ::= x ; Variables v ; Values (lambda (x) t) ; Lambda abstractions (t t) ; Application (t : τ) ; Type annotation (if t t t)) (v ::= (lambda (x) t) true false) (x ::= variable-not-otherwise-mentioned) (τ ::= bool (τ -> τ)) ;; Type environment (Γ ::= ((x τ) ...))) ;;; Helpers for type environments (define-language REDEX) (define-judgment-form REDEX #:mode (lookup I I O) #:contract (lookup ((any any) ...) any any) [(lookup (_ ... (any any_0) _ ...) any any_0)]) ;; Assign or set a type of variable (define-metafunction REDEX ext1 : ((any any) ...) (any any) -> ((any any) ...) ;; any_k exists -> assign [(ext1 (any_0 ... (any_k any_v0) any_1 ...) (any_k any_v1)) (any_0 ... (any_k any_v1) any_1 ...)] ;; Add new [(ext1 (any_0 ...) (any_k any_v1)) ((any_k any_v1) any_0 ...)]) ;;; The typing rules ;; Need two judgment relations because of different modes: ;; - Checking (:-c ... <= ...) takes everything as input ;; - Inferring (:- ... => ...) outputs the type (define-judgment-form L ;; (:-c Γ t <= τ) "t can be checked to have the given type τ in context Γ" #:mode (:-c I I I I) #:contract (:-c Γ t any τ) [(:-c Γ t_1 <= bool) (:-c Γ t_2 <= τ) (:-c Γ t_3 <= τ) --- bt-if (:-c Γ (if t_1 t_2 t_3) <= τ)] [(:-c (ext1 Γ (x τ_1)) t <= τ_2) --- bt-abs (:-c Γ (lambda (x) t) <= (τ_1 -> τ_2))] [(:- Γ t => τ) --- bt-checkinfer (:-c Γ t <= τ)] ) (define-judgment-form L ;; (:- Γ t => τ) "t's type can be inferred to be τ in context Γ" #:mode (:- I I I O) #:contract (:- Γ t any τ) [(lookup Γ x τ) ---- bt-var (:- Γ x => τ)] [---- bt-true (:- Γ true => bool)] [---- bt-false (:- Γ false => bool)] [(:-c Γ t <= τ) --- bt-ann (:- Γ (t : τ) => τ)] ) ;;; Tests (check-equal? (judgment-holds (:- ((x bool)) x => any_1) any_1) '(bool)) (check-true (judgment-holds (:-c () (if true false true) <= bool))) (check-equal? (judgment-holds (:- () ((if true false true) : bool) => any_1) any_1) '(bool)) (check-true (judgment-holds (:-c ((x bool)) (if x false true) <= bool))) (check-true (judgment-holds (:-c ((x bool)) x <= bool))) (check-true (judgment-holds (:-c () (lambda (x) x) <= (bool -> bool)))) (check-true (judgment-holds (:-c () (lambda (x) (if x false true)) <= (bool -> bool)))) (check-equal? (judgment-holds (:- () ((lambda (x) (if x false true)) : (bool -> bool)) => any_1) any_1) '((bool -> bool))) ;; Show me the derivation tree of the proof: ;; (show-derivations ;; (build-derivations ;; (:- () ;; ((lambda (x) (if x false true)) ;; : (bool -> bool)) ;; => any_1)))